CITTA Brokerage Co. - Duty Drawback, Simplified.
  • Duty Drawback
  • Industries
  • Referral Partners
  • Resources
    • Drawback Calculator
    • Blog
    • Case Studies
    • Webinars and Videos
    • FAQs
  • About
  • Contact

SCOTUS Shoots Down IEEPA Tariffs: What It Means for Duty Drawback

Simran Dalvi, Director of Legal and Compliance
February 20, 2026
3 minutes read
TABLE OF CONTENTS
  • What the Ruling Covers
  • The Duty Drawback Picture
  • Should You Still Invest in a Drawback Program?
  • One Key Piece of Advice: Skip the Protest Route
  • Looking Ahead

On February 20, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) does not authorize the president to impose tariffs. Writing for the majority, Chief Justice John Roberts held that two words in the statute — “regulate” and “importation,” separated by 16 others in Section 1702(a)(1)(B) — “cannot bear such weight.”

The ruling invalidates the tariffs imposed under IEEPA, including the reciprocal tariffs and the fentanyl-related tariffs on goods from certain countries. Tariffs imposed under other statutes remain in effect. Here is what importers and businesses with duty drawback programs need to know.

What the Ruling Covers

The ruling is sweeping in its rebuke of IEEPA but targeted in what it invalidates. Two types of tariffs are directly affected:

  • Reciprocal tariffs — the across-the-board minimum 10% import duties on virtually all U.S. trading partners, announced on “Liberation Day”
  • Drug trafficking tariffs — the 25% tariffs on imports from certain countries justified under a fentanyl emergency declaration

Critically, tariffs imposed under other statutes — Section 232 (national security) and Section 301 (unfair trade practices) — are not affected by this ruling and remain in place.

One important practical note: don’t expect an immediate halt at the ports. For the next few days, or possibly up to a week, we believe it will be business as usual until Customs and Border Protection (CBP) issues guidelines.

The Duty Drawback Picture

Duty drawback remains a vital tool — a quiet but reliable revenue stream — regardless of today’s ruling. That said, the landscape has shifted and it is worth understanding exactly what has changed.

  • Fentanyl tariffs were never drawback eligible, so their invalidation has no drawback impact.
  • Reciprocal tariffs were drawback eligible — but since they’re now void, that eligibility is moot.
  • Section 301 and certain goods under Section 232 tariffs remain in place and are fully claimable through drawback.
  • Avoid double-dipping: if a client files for a refund through the Court of International Trade (CIT), they cannot also claim drawback on the same duties. Strategy matters here.

This ruling creates a temporary destabilization of the tariff base — not of drawback itself. Duty drawback has been a recovery tool long before IEEPA entered the picture, and it will continue to be.

Should You Still Invest in a Drawback Program?

Yes — and here is why the case for drawback remains strong even as one chapter of increased tariff rates closes:

  • Remaining tariffs (Section 301, 232) are still fully claimable at up to 99% recovery.
  • President Trump has already signaled he will pursue tariffs under alternative authorities. On February 20 he announced a 10% global tariff on top of all remaining tariffs through Section 122 of the 1974 Trade Act. He also committed to additional and more permanent tariffs through other methods, meaning new tariff liabilities are coming.

One Key Piece of Advice: Skip the Protest Route

For businesses seeking refunds on IEEPA tariffs already paid, we recommend you speak with your trade attorney about whether to file a protest or a post-summary correction (PSC).

CITTA is advising our clients to file directly with the Court of International Trade (CIT) instead of filing a protest or PSC. The reason is simple: a protest can sit for two to three years before resolution. CIT offers a faster, more efficient path — and given the volume of cases already filed, speed matters.

Looking Ahead

This ruling is significant, but it doesn’t mean the end of the Trump Administration’s tariff-based trade policy. In fact, the administration has already signaled it will invoke alternative legal authorities quickly — Section 122 of the 1974 Trade Act, as well as expanded Section 301 and 232 actions — and new tariff structures are already being announced.

In an environment this fluid, a duty drawback program remains a critical recovery tool. Further guidance from CBP and the Court of International Trade on refund processes is expected in the days ahead.

For additional updates, write to info@cittabrokerage.com with the subject line, “Subscribe.”

Back to Blog
Customs Duty Defined: Your Guide to Optimizing International Trade Operations 
February 17, 2026

Customs Duty Defined: Your Guide to Optimizing International Trade Operations 

Read More
January 8, 2026

How Tariffs Affect Businesses: A Strategic Guide

Read More
International shipping container on a keyboard
November 10, 2025

Why You Should Re-Evaluate Your Duty Drawback Program Now

Read More
CITTA Brokerage Co. - Duty Drawback, Simplified.
QUICK LINKS
  • Home
  • Duty Drawback
  • Industries
  • Referral Partners
  • Resources
  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
CONTACT US
info@cittabrokerage.com2225 Washington Blvd., Suite 375
Ogden, UT 84401
801.479.7873
© 2026 CITTA Brokerage Co. - All Rights Reserved
David Taylor Digital | NJ Digital Marketing